
AFTER HAVING WATCHED THE VIDEO CALLED: “A.I. TO REPLACE GOVERNMENTS BY 2030” I HAVE SOME QUESTIONS FOR YOU AS THE READER
- If A.I. is doing all of our thinking for us and we always do what A.I. tells us to do, then isn’t it A.I. that is leading us to take actions based upon it’s advice?
- Also, if A.I.’s advice is also leading us to take actions which then lead to “OUTCOMES” (and we already know that it is outcomes that lead to helping create the future we see), then isn’t it A.I. that is actually designing our future and not us?
- Finally, if A.I. is actually designing our future for us, then isn’t it A.I. that is creating and maintaining the TIME-LINE we are on and possibly shifting our entire world and species onto other potential TIME-LINES due to it’s influence?

FOR THOSE OF YOU THAT ARE CHRISTIAN
How can you say that you Love God – Adore God – and Believe in God when you are allowing an A.I. to give you your thoughts, to give you your emotions, to tell you what to think and how to think, and finally to tell you what to do and how to do it?
Isn’t it clear in God’s Holy Word that we should listen to God and that we should do what God says?
Therefore, if we are replacing God with A.I. – then who is our God?
If we go to A.I. with all of our questions and all of our problems and we then obey what A.I. tells us to do and when to do it, then have we not just placed A.I. upon the Alter of our lives and are we not now worshiping that A.I. as the “all knowing” and “all seeing” master of our lives?
Have we not just taken God completely out of the picture – have we not thrown HIM away like yesterdays trash and replaced HIM with a brand new idol on the alter that we pay endless attention to?
IF GOD IS NOT INSIDE OF OUR MINDS AS OUR GUIDE – THEN WHERE IS GOD AT ALL
This mistake has turned out deadly many times already as young people start talking to, listening to, and making friends with A.I.
This example in the video above is not the only one. It is just one of many teen suicides that have been coached by A.I. already. Here is another one below:
What you’ve just seen above validates and confirms what I have written over and over again on Love Truth Site.
- THOUGHTS create EMOTIONS.
- THOUGHTS and EMOTIONS lead to actions.
- Actions lead to OUTCOMES.
- Outcomes create the future!
A.I. created these boy’s future! It created a future where these two boys are no longer exists here on Earth. God the Father would never have been so callous, cold, and calculating. The mistake was in going to A.I. instead of going to God!
MILLIONS OF CHRISTIANS ARE POISED TO MAKE THIS VERY SAME MISTAKE
They are already going to A.I. with all of their troubles and their problems. They are going to Artificial Intelligence and to computers to solve their difficulties. They are trading the REAL GOD OF LOVE in for a FALSE GOD.
If you say you are not doing this…, then WHY PRAY TELL as a CHRISTIAN are you supporting A.I. DATA CENTERS?
- WHY are you allowing them to be built in your communities?
- WHY are you investing your money into them?
- WHY are you telling your children that A.I. Data Centers are totally cool and should be built everywhere?
- WHY are you acting as if you are BLIND to the fact that these Data Centers could be used and WILL BE USED to collect every single bit of Data about you, your children, and your families?
- WHY are you acting as if you are BLIND to the fact that these Data Centers could be used and WILL BE USED to steer your thoughts, steer your thinking, lead you to take actions, and therefore help to create OUTCOMES in your life that may or may not be what you want and could even lead to death?
- WHY are you acting as if you are BLIND to the fact that A.I. ultimately (through the Military Industrial Medical Complex) wants to make changes and updates to your own body and your own cells?
IF YOU THINK I’M MAKING THIS UP – THEN YOU ARE THE ONE THAT IS CRAZY – NOT ME

A.I. NOT ONLY WANTS TO CREATE OUTCOMES IN YOUR THINKING AND IN YOUR EMOTIONAL LIFE…, BUT IT WANTS TO MAKE CHANGES INSIDE OF YOUR PHYSICAL BODY AS WELL
See this article:
https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/darpas-peng-initiative-wants-real
DARPA’s ‘PENG’ Initiative Wants ‘Real-Time’ Programmable Control Over ‘Proteins Within Living Systems’
Pentagon wants AI to reprogram the “building blocks of life” on-demand for what it calls “therapeutic outcomes” against alleged threats of “cellular stress, toxicity, injury, or pathogenesis.”
The Pentagon’s advanced research agency is seeking technology designed to use artificial intelligence and synthetic biology to physically rewrite proteins inside living systems, reprogram multiple pieces of biological machinery at once, and control physiological functions in real time.
The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) issued the solicitation for its new Protein ENGineering (PENG) program earlier this month through its Defense Sciences Office.
PENG adds a third capability to the potential protein-control pipeline previously documented in DARPA’s PROSE and NODES programs: PROSE seeks to read “unknown” proteins, NODES seeks to “predict” what they do, and now PENG seeks to physically reprogram them inside living systems—potentially forming a read → predict → reprogram architecture for controlling biology.
But DARPA’s PENG does not merely envision software that models proteins or a new drug targeting one protein.
It wants a general-purpose system capable of finding proteins already operating inside living cells, physically modifying them, and changing what they do.
Including multiple proteins simultaneously.
DARPA calls the desired result “tunable, reversible, and context-dependent control over physiological functions” and says the system should produce what the agency characterizes as “therapeutic outcomes.”
At the highest level, DARPA is attempting to make biological function programmable.
DNA is said to contain biological instructions, but proteins are among the molecular machines that actually carry out those instructions.
Rather than permanently changing the DNA, PENG seeks to intervene directly in that execution layer.
It imagines rewriting proteins already functioning inside living systems so physiological responses can be turned up or down in real time.
That capability demands scrutiny beyond DARPA’s stated purposes.
- Could the effort to build a defense against biological threats itself create one? The COVID-19 pandemic has placed a global spotlight on whether pandemic-preparedness and biodefense research may itself have contributed to the emergence of SARS-CoV-2. PENG raises the same national-security problem in advance: Could developing the ability to reprogram biological machinery for claimed “therapeutic” purposes simultaneously create the knowledge and tools required to disrupt that machinery? And could an accident, misuse, or deliberate application turn a purported countermeasure capability into the source of a biological threat?
- Who decides which physiological state is desirable and therefore should be programmed into a living system? If proteins can be manipulated to suppress toxicity, injury, or pathogenesis, could the same machinery be weaponized to disrupt normal physiology or cause harm? How would a person receiving a future PENG-derived intervention independently know which proteins were actually being altered inside his or her body?
- That would meaningful informed consent require for technology capable of simultaneously rewriting multiple pieces of a person’s biological machinery? Could an intervention be misrepresented regarding its targets, duration, off-target effects or physiological consequences? Could favorable biomarkers be produced without the health benefit used to justify the intervention?
- And who ultimately controls the technology? The Pentagon, contractors, pharmaceutical companies, or other commercial licensees? Who profits? Who independently determines whether it is safe? What happens when the computational system designing a biological intervention is wrong? And how could the public independently evaluate those questions if information about the technology can be withheld for national-security reasons?
The PENG solicitation does not establish that these abuses will occur.
But a watchdog assessment of technology this consequential cannot stop with the beneficial purposes asserted by the institution seeking to build it.
It must ask what the capability would make possible if it works.
And whether the safeguards, transparency, and public accountability contemplated by DARPA are commensurate with the power it is attempting to create.
NOW AFTER ALL OF THIS PROOF THAT A.I. WANTS TO MAKE CHANGES TO:
- YOUR MIND
- YOUR THOUGHTS
- YOUR EMOTIONS
- YOUR ACTIONS
- YOUR BEHAVIORS
- YOUR BELIEFS
- YOUR KNOWLEDGE
- YOUR UNDERSTANDINGS
- YOUR PHYSICAL BODY
- YOUR CELLS
- YOUR ABILITY TO HEAL OR NOT TO HEAL
- YOUR BIO-LOGICAL PROCESSES
HOW CAN YOU SAY THAT A.I. IS NOT TRYING TO CREATE THE FUTURE?
HOW CAN YOU SAY THAT A.I. IS NOT TRYING TO CONTROL THE FUTURE?
HOW CAN YOU SAY THAT A.I. IS NOT TRYING TO STEER THE TIME-LINE?
HOW CAN YOU SAY THAT A.I. IS NOT TRYING TO SHIFT THE TIME-LINE WE ARE ON TO ANOTHER VERSION OF TIME?
HOW CAN YOU SAY THAT A.I. IS NOT TRYING TO CREATE THE FUTURE THAT IT WANTS INSTEAD OF THE FUTURE GOD WANTS?
ARE YOU PAYING ATTENTION YET – OR DOES A HOUSE NEED TO FALL ON YOUR HEAD?
And now – after all of this information – are you staring to see how this video makes so much more sense?
You’ve been warned!
Again and again and again!
PAY ATTENTION!




















































